Moral panic
A sociological concept describing widespread fear of a perceived threat.
Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons
A moral panic, sometimes called a social panic, describes a broad, shared fear that a particular person or thing is endangering a community’s values, interests, or well-being. It involves stirring up public concern over an issue, often driven by moral entrepreneurs and sensational media coverage, and is frequently amplified by politicians and lawmakers. This can lead to new laws meant to control the community. The term was coined by British sociologist Stanley Cohen, who first used it in his PhD thesis (1967–1969), later published as the 1972 book *Folk Devils and Moral Panics*.
Cohen defined a moral panic as occurring when “a condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests.” While the underlying issues may be real, the claims tend to exaggerate the seriousness, extent, typicality, or inevitability of harm. The concept is studied in sociology, criminology, media studies, and cultural studies, and is often viewed academically as irrational.
Examples include the belief in widespread child abduction by predatory pedophiles and the idea of ritual abuse of women and children by Satanic cults. Some moral panics become embedded in mainstream political discourse, such as the Red Scare and terrorism. Moral panic differs from mass hysteria, which is more of a psychological illness than a sociological phenomenon.
Though the phrase “moral panic” appeared in an 1830 religious magazine regarding a sermon, that usage was entirely different from its modern social science meaning. A later use in 1831 may have been closer to today’s sense. Marshall McLuhan, in his 1964 book *Understanding Media*, articulated the concept academically without using the term, describing the effects of media.
Cohen developed the concept to analyze how the British public reacted to the 1960s rivalry between “mod” and “rocker” youth subcultures. He was interested in how agents of social control amplified deviance, potentially damaging the identities of those labeled “deviant” and encouraging them to adopt deviant behavior. These groups were labeled as threats to society’s core values, becoming “folk devils.” Media, political actors, and other moral entrepreneurs often present such groups as not just deviant but morally abhorrent.
In studying mods and rockers, Cohen identified a pattern of construction and reaction that exten
- field
- Sociology, criminology, media studies, cultural studies
- known_for
- Developing the concept of moral panic
- key_work
- Folk Devils and Moral Panics (1972)
- origin
- United Kingdom
- related_concept
- Folk devils
Lore & Background
Stanley Cohen, who developed the term, states that moral panic happens when 'a condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests'. While the issues identified may be real, the claims 'exaggerate the seriousness, extent, typicality and/or inevitability of harm'. Cohen's initial development of the concept was for the purpose of analyzing the definition of and social reaction to the 'mod' and 'rocker' youth subcultures of the 1960s and 1970s as a social problem. He identified five sequential stages of moral panic: an event is perceived as a threat; the mass media amplify the threat; public anxiety is aroused; moral gatekeepers respond with diagnoses and solutions; the condition then disappears, submerges, or deteriorates.
Reader's Guide
The concept of moral panic is significant because it provides a framework for understanding how societies react to perceived threats, often in ways that are disproportionate or irrational. Cohen's model highlights the roles of mass media, moral entrepreneurs, the culture of social control, and the public in constructing and amplifying these panics. The term is now studied in sociology, criminology, media studies, and cultural studies. Examples include the belief in widespread abduction of children by predatory pedophiles and belief in ritual abuse of women and children by Satanic cults. Some moral panics become embedded in standard political discourse, such as the Red Scare and terrorism. The concept differs from mass hysteria, which is closer to a psychological illness. Cohen maintained that the term 'panic' is suitable when used as an extended metaphor, though it connotes irrationality and a lack of control.
Did You Know?
- Stanley Cohen introduced the phrase 'moral panic' in a 1967–1969 PhD thesis.
- Cohen's 1972 book Folk Devils and Moral Panics analyzed the reaction to the 'mod' and 'rocker' youth subcultures.
- Moral panic can give rise to new laws aimed at controlling the community.
- The concept was used in a 1830 religious magazine, but in a way that completely differs from its modern social science application.
More in Ethics & Morality 1-24
Elsewhere in the Ethics & Morality universe
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record